"The age of transitions" is the last book written by the Belgian philosopher Pascal Chabot. For the author, the transition is the good change, the "desired change". He even claims that philosophy is the "thought of transitions", which is not quite convincing, especially when he refers to the myth of the cavern used by Plato. In fact, the transitions he mentions are not philosophical or even cultural, but social and economic. He mainly quotes the energy transition and the demographic transition and pleads for a generalized "transitology". In his view, any disruption is impossible, because the world has become too complex for sustaining a disruption. Such a fear is understandable , but the argument seems too simple. It would have been necessary to explain first that a change is needed, because the present globalization is clearly unsustainable, as it is not possible to carry on undefinitely an exponential growth. The transition corresponds to a voluntary inflexion. Still, it is not clear at all that the rulers of the present globalized world will be able to decide spontaneously such a change . The gap between words and reality is growing and, therefore, the risk remains high that the change will occur not through a transition, but through a disruption. The complexity of the technical and economic system does not decrease, but rather increase such a risk, as a society which becomes very complex is also less resilient, as shown by the historian Joseph Tainter. In such a case the whole present civilization might collapse, either due to an environmental catastrophy, or a globalized military conflict. Then it will be too late for any transition, as all transitions require time.
Le dernier ouvrage du philosophe belge Pascal Chabot s'intitule "L'âge des transitions". Selon l'auteur, la transition, c'est le bon changement, "le changement désiré". Certes, et c'est aussi, pourrait-on ajouter, "le changement maîtrisé". L'auteur va plus loin et affirme que la philosophie est "la pensée des transitions". Cette affirmation est plus discutable, surtout quand elle s'appuie sur l'exemple de la caverne de Platon. Le terme de transition ne semble guère approprié pour évoquer l'éveil ou la conversion du regard, qui font passer de l'obscurité à la lumière, des illusions à la vérité.
De fait, les principales transitions qu'évoque l'auteur ne sont pas philosophiques, mais économiques et sociales. Il évoque, notamment, la transition énergétique et la transition démographique et exprime son penchant pour une "transitologie" généralisée. En effet, selon lui, la rupture est devenue impossible. Toute posture radicale est désuète, car le monde est devenu trop complexe. On ne peut plus le bouleverser sans le détruire. On peut comprendre la crainte qu'exprime Pascal Chabot d'une destruction qui deviendrait irrésistible. Il s'agit là toutefois d'un point de vue qui peut sembler quelque peu limité, voire naïf. Il faudrait d'abord expliquer pourquoi le changement est devenu indispensable.
